Solid programming overall, though some of the panels ran long and felt repetitive. The hydrogen track in particular was excellent and worth the trip on its own.
Ways to improve the conference: Add more structured networking for first-time attendees.
Recommendation: Definitely recommend
Decent conference but the venue logistics could be improved — long lines and packed rooms during the most popular sessions. Content quality was high, however.
Ways to improve the conference: Consider larger rooms for the most popular breakout sessions.
Recommendation: Probably recommend
One of the better energy events I have attended this year. The conversations around long-duration storage and net-zero pathways were forward-looking and substantive.
Recommendation: Definitely recommend
Solid programming overall, though some of the panels ran long and felt repetitive. The hydrogen track in particular was excellent and worth the trip on its own.
Ways to improve the conference: Better signage around the venue would improve flow.
Recommendation: Definitely recommend
Great mix of policy and technical content. The exhibition hall showcased some genuinely novel clean-tech solutions, and the breakout workshops were hands-on and practical.
Ways to improve the conference: Add more structured networking for first-time attendees.
Recommendation: Probably recommend
Solid programming overall, though some of the panels ran long and felt repetitive. The hydrogen track in particular was excellent and worth the trip on its own.
Ways to improve the conference: Consider larger rooms for the most popular breakout sessions.
Recommendation: Probably recommend
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8:00am | |||||
| 9:00am | |||||
| 10:00am | |||||
| 11:00am | |||||
| 12:00pm | |||||
| 1:00pm | |||||
| 2:00pm | |||||
| 3:00pm | |||||
| 4:00pm | |||||
| 5:00pm | |||||
| 6:00pm |
Comments